<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Hamilton Pool Road</title>
      <link>http://www.hproad.net/</link>
      <description>Hamilton Pool Road is a beautiful little road in Travis County, Texas. We live there.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:22:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>HCA: Hamilton Pool is an irreplaceable Hill Country treasure</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Hill Country Alliance is <a href="http://www.hillcountryalliance.org/public/BBCopy.cfm?IID=276">tracking the Hamilton Pool degradation story</a> , including the full text of Judge Biscoe's letter to TCEQ. He says:<blockquote>Based on their site analysis, the consultants have concluded that the Agreed Order to remove visible accumulations of sediment from Hamilton Creek and its tributaries is insufficent.  Effects of the site pollution have been documented on a 4 ½ mile stretch between the project site and the confluence of Hamilton Creek with the Pedernales River.  <strong>There is no mention in the Agreed Order of any remediation of Hamilton Pool.</strong>  In addition, the Agreed Order does not address site access to affected parties downstream, controls to address the biological and ecological effects of the sedimentation pollution and/or any assesments of remediation alternatives and associated effects downstream. </blockquote>

Go, Judge B!





]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hca-hamilton-pool-is-an-irrepl.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hca-hamilton-pool-is-an-irrepl.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>AAS take on new LCRA board members</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Statesman <a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/10/20/1020roundup.html?cxtype=rss&amp;cxsvc=7&amp;cxcat=52">has a unique take on Perry's new appointments</a>:

<div style="font-size: large; font-weight: bold;">LCRA gets five new board members</div>
<div style="font-size: medium; font-weight: bold;">Emaciated dogs taken from man's home</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/aas-take-on-new-lcra-board-mem.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/aas-take-on-new-lcra-board-mem.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">lcra</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:40:25 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hammett&apos;s Flyover, the Meeting</title>
         <description><![CDATA[It's happening.

From Pam Reese:

<blockquote>October 23rd, Tuesday

7:00 pm

Westcave Preserve

Our guest speakers will include Joe Perez, the TXDot design manager for <a href="http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hammets_flyover.html">the new bridge</a>, and <a href="http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/replace_gerald_daugherty.html">Gerald Daugherty, Travis County Commissioner</a>. Following comments from these two guests, there will be an open discussion period.</blockquote>


This is going to be a verrrry interesting meeting.



 

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hammetts-flyover-the-meeting.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hammetts-flyover-the-meeting.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:05:13 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Moratorium on Development in Hamilton Pool Watershed</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Hamilton Pool is a uniquely valuable resource in Travis County, and  by the developer's admission, <a href="http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/ranches_at_hamilton_pool_road.html">current development rules are inadequate to protect it</a>.

TCEQ, Travis and Hays counties, and LCRA need to come together right now to devise rules that  protect this one of a kind resource. And until they do, there needs to be a <strong>moratorium on development in the watershed contributing to Hamilton Pool</strong>.

 ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/moratorium-on-development-in-h.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/moratorium-on-development-in-h.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:57:22 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ranches at Hamilton Pool Responds to Slap on Wrist</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/10/13/1013hamilton.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=52">Quoth Coldwater:</a>
<blockquote>"Our erosion controls and silt fences were approved by Hays County and were inspected prior to construction and after this disaster," said Cosmo Palmieri, the project manager for Coldwater Development. "We were in full compliance."</blockquote>

I'm going to remember this next time during <a href="http://www.waterqualityplan.org/">some consensus process</a>, developers complain that they need prescriptive rules, which, if they comply with those rules, vaccinate them against liability. Fortunately, we don't have such rules in place, and the county should sue their pants off. 

Our vigilant sympathizer South Texas Chisme <a href="http://stxc.blogspot.com/2007/10/hamilton-pool-polluters-whine-about.html">has been following the story</a>:

<blockquote>Apparently, they were under the impression that under Republican regimes, polluters were handed flowers. Hey, this is election season and the 'we make our own reality' party is trying to look like they care a tiny bit about our environment. Hence, the small fine instead of flowers. Take heart: It wasn't a real fine.</blockquote>

Added to <a href="http://planet.hproad.net/">Planet HPR</a>!


]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/ranches-at-hamilton-pool-road.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/ranches-at-hamilton-pool-road.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:11:12 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>TCEQ Fines Ranches at Hamilton Pool $85,000</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Somehow back in June I neglected to post these heartbreaking photos taken by Mara Eurich of the damage done to Hamilton Pool by the runoff from The Ranches at Hamilton Pool development:

<img alt="hp1.jpg" src="http://www.hproad.net/hp1.jpg" width="221" height="166" />


<img alt="hp2.jpg" src="http://www.hproad.net/hp2.jpg" width="224" height="166" />



<a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/10/12/1012hamilton.html?">TCEQ has fined the developers $85,000</a>, but Travis County considers that inadequate, and may sue for the full cleanup of Hamilton Pool and Hamilton Creek, which are  still coated with chalky sediment.

Considering what to do is <a href="http://www.co.travis.tx.us/commissioners_court/agendas/voting_session_agenda.asp">on the Commissioner's Court agenda for October 16</a>.

Update: <a href="http://www5.tceq.state.tx.us/oce/waci/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.investigation&invid=872514402007157">here is the TCEQ complaint</a>.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/tceq-fines-ranches-at-hamilton.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/tceq-fines-ranches-at-hamilton.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:00:23 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Planet HPR</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Check out <a href="http://planet.hproad.net/">Planet HPR</a>, an evolving and frequently updated compendium of blog entries somehow, at least in my own mind, related to HPR.

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/planet-hpr.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/planet-hpr.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">links</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:56:07 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Replace Gerald Daugherty</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://salcostello.blogspot.com/">Sal Costello</a>, in <a href="http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hammets_flyover.html#comment-2371">a comment yesterday</a>, reminds us that Gerald Daugherty is up for re-election next March. And we really need a candidate to replace him! 

<img src="http://www.co.travis.tx.us/commissioners_court/images/daugherty.jpg" alt="The Gerald" style="float:right">

It's kind of amazing how large an area Precinct 3 covers: Hamilton Pool Road, Spicewood, Bee Cave, Lakeway, and also Lago Vista and Jonestown! Not to mention West Austin and West Lake Hills.

Democrats have done poorly in this precinct, but we could beat him in the Republican primary. The most viable opponent would be a Republican who favors planned growth and conservation of the Hill Country, and opposes toll roads. There are lots of Republican voters madder than hell about toll roads, and Gerald has put himself in a spot of bother. 

I know we have several sympathetic Republicans along HPR here -- are any of you mad enough, and energetic enough, to take on this burden? You will <a href="http://salcostello.blogspot.com/2007/10/bad-campo-bad.html">get tons of help, says Sal</a>: 

<blockquote>Our Political Action Committee has a campaign strategy that works, but we need funded viable opponents to contact me at sal at austintollparty.com ASAP. Most deadlines to run for office are at the first of the year. Most viable opponents announce from September to November. A viable opponent is someone who already has a base of supporters and can raise large sums of money to support a full campaign office, an experienced campaign manager and equally important - the money to put forward a political advertising campaign to communicate with voters.</blockquote>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/replace-gerald-daugherty.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/replace-gerald-daugherty.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:27:39 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hammett&apos;s Flyover</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Ric <a href="http://www.neighborsinparadise.org/newBridge.html">posts a detailed report</a> about TxDOT plans to "improve" <a href="http://www.neighborsinparadise.org/hammetts.html">Hammett's Crossing</a>, the low water bridge across the Pedernales. The crossing floods several times a year, and the switchbacks on the east side catch an unwary tractor trailer every year or so (in spite of warning signs). 

As a resident of the east side of the crossing, the flooding never inconveniences me. I love this scenic place where you can cross inches above the water.<img src="http://www.neighborsinparadise.org/images/Hammett%27s1952.jpg" alt="Hammett's crossing with an unknown model posing in 1952" style="float: right"> 

If west side residents wanted the bridge improved, I would have to defer to that. When the bridge is closed (usually a day or so at a time), their drive to the grocery store goes up a good twenty or thirty  miles (via Fall Creek Rd to 71).  I think it would be possible for TxDOT to build a better bridge and to preserve the existing crossing as a pedestrian walkway (as Ric's article mentions is the intent). The county already owns the adjacent park land on the southeast, so that would be suitable parking, and could make this little crossing more accessible.

But two points.

1. Ric is a west side resident and gladly puts up with the occasional inconvenience. He doesn't want a bridge, and I don't need one, so I'm on his side.

2. The county commish, Gerald "The Gerald" Daugherty, is probably conniving as we speak to drum up his developer base to press for "improvements" to HPR making it just one more arterial in his vision of Western Travis county as a cul de sac community. If I trusted my elected representative just wanted to improve the lives of Ric and Annie out there, I could be persuaded; but I know this is just a windfall, federally funded opportunity for him to open up the west side of the Pedernales to development by his political cronies.








]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hammets-flyover.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/hammets-flyover.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:06:25 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Get rich, or get out of the way</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Texas was founded as a real estate speculation, and that spirit lives on. Not much effort goes into real economic development -- manufacturing, jobs, sustainability. The local real estate agents don't really make money that way. Not in the near term. What this town needs is a few dozen cul de sac subdivisions and a Home Depot. Get rich, or get out of the way!

Here's a typical blurb from <a href="http://www.dsoutlook.com/archive/DSO1007web.pdf">this month's Dripping Springs Outlook</a>:

<blockquote>Have you noticed the excitement in the air around Dripping Springs lately? As you drive into town and approach the intersection of Ranch Road 12 and Highway 290, <strong>bulldozers are zipping around the new Home Depot site on the southeast corner</strong>. The Sonic is packed; it’s hard to find a spot at noon. There are folks rushing in and out of City Hall and the County Commissioner’s office as new development is springing up in all four directions. Some days it feels like we are a sleepy little town, stretching, yawning, and waking up to a brand new day, full of new sights and sounds and lots of activity. Everyone wants to know what’s going on and when things are coming.

With the bustling growth in Dripping Springs, word is spreading quickly around Austin, the entire state and the nation. Buyers are coming from other parts of Texas as well as from California and <strong>all the way to the East Coast</strong>. Everyone wants a piece of the Hill Country and the area around Dripping Springs is at the top of the list.</blockquote>

Heck, I bet they're talking about us in New York City!


]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/get-rich-or-get-out-of-the-way.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/10/get-rich-or-get-out-of-the-way.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:56:18 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Killer House</title>
         <description><![CDATA[We've had two bird kills in the past couple of weeks. A year ago<a href="http://www.hproad.net/2006/07/house_vs_bird.html"> I reported two window-bird collision incidents</a> -- we've had many since. From my office I may hear a collision a day. I don't check many of them out. Probably a good many of them have been fatal, but scavengers harvest the bodies.

Today a little hummingbird crashed right into the window in front of my desk. He fell to the porch. When I approached him he managed to fly a bit but ran out of gas and perched uncertainly on a cord that holds one of our trees upright. He teetered there a while. I pulled the guts out of a Bic pen and used the red tube as a dropper, and gave him a few sips of sugar water from the feeder. They have tiny needles for tongues and he lapped at it a little. I left him a lone for periods up to ten minutes, hoping he could gather his energy and fly; but after an hour perching on his rope he fell to the ground, I put him in a box on a soft cloth but it only took him a few more minutes to give up the ghost. Waaah!

A week or so ago a dove crashed heavily into the same window. K & I ran out and found him stunned, but looking like he was recovering -- cocking his head and looking at us.  We left him to recover on the porch where he'd falllen -- but ten minutes later he was limp. 

I clearly see what is fooling them. You can see the bright clouds on the horizon dozens of miles of way, reflected in our windows. The birds see nothing but air for 30 miles and careen full speed into the windows. 

We need to find a way to make our windows non-reflective, and ideally our view out the windows would remain the same. The problem is widespread, especially for office buildings. <a href="http://www.nwf.org/nationalwildlife/printerFriendly.cfm?issueID=9&articleID=52">This article surveys the problem</a> and suggests

<blockquote>As one solution, Mesure and Hanlon are looking at an opaque window film designed by 3M that allows people to look out of but not into a window. Currently, it's not available to the public and only being used to place advertisements over bus and taxi windows. Mesure became convinced it could save birds' lives after he experimented with it on his own problem window at home. Not a single bird has hit it in the five years since. "The problem may be that people won't be able to get around how different it looks," says Mesure.</blockquote>

Not sure how we need to go so far as to make our windows opaque. Seems to me, all we need to do is inhibit the reflection of the far horizon. I just need to find some thin film technology appropriate for household use.




]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/killer-house.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/killer-house.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">wildlife</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:22:14 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Public Hearing on Belterra Discharge Permit</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Timely opportunity! Work out a little of your outrage over <a href="http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/charles_in_chains.html">Makar Properties' treatment of Charles O'Dell</a>, constructively.  Show up at <a href="http://www.hillcountryalliance.org/public/BBCopy.cfm?IID=266">the TCEQ hearing Tuesday</a> and declare your opposition <a href="http://www.hillcountryalliance.org/public/issuedetails.cfm?cattypeid=66">to permitting this development to discharge wastewater into Bear Creek</a>.


]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/public-hearing-on-belterra-dis.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/public-hearing-on-belterra-dis.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">advocacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:43:58 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Charles In Chains</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.hproad.net/09-21-07_1627.jpg"  style="float: right; width: 320px; height: 240px; margin: 1em;" alt="Charles O'Dell and Hanlon Skillman at Charles' sentencing" title="Charles O'Dell and Hanlon Skillman at  Charles' sentencing" >
Our friend Charles O'Dell, active in almost all of the regional issues that affect us here on HPR, was found guilty today in Dripping Springs, of violating their ordinance against erecting signs in the right of way. See, Charles has been actively protesting at the Belterra development, where the <a href="http://www.hillcountryalliance.org/public/issuedetails.cfm?cattypeid=66">developers are seeking a permit that would allow them to discharge wastewater (in "emergencies") into Bear Creek. </a>So the developers, Makar Properties, bugged the City to issue Charles a citation. Today he was found guilty on one count and fined $500. About 10 supporters, including Hays County Commisioner <a href="http://www.co.hays.tx.us/commissioners/bio/bio4.html">Karen Ford</a>,  showed up as he was read his penalty. His lawyer indicated he believes they have grounds for a retrial, and failing that, they will appeal.

But that was Charles, making trouble. The signs below, are from nice companies that are the bedrock of the D.S. economy, and their kind of free speech is OK:
<img alt="signs1.jpg" src="http://www.hproad.net/signs1.jpg" width="222" height="166" style="margin: 2px;"/><img alt="signs2.jpg" src="http://www.hproad.net/signs3.jpg" width="222" height="166" style="margin: 2px;"/>

Honestly, if you know Charles, you know he's a gentle, persistent advocate for water quality.  His lawyer wasn't admitting Charles erected any sign; but to single out any sign Charles might have put out with his sensible message calling attention to a topic of public interest, while ignoring the signs of the real estate developers that run things out here, used to be called "selective enforcement." 

<img alt="signs2.jpg" src="http://www.hproad.net/signs2.jpg" width="222" height="166" style="margin: 2px;"/>

[Updated: mis-attributed roadside sign photos to Hanlon Skillman -- he says they are really by Charles]
[Update 2: changed photo ]


]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/charles-in-chains.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/charles-in-chains.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">advocacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:26:16 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Dark skies reduce crime</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Hamilton Market -- you listening? <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/20/070820fa_fact_owen">This article from the New Yorker</a> remarks that turning off the lights can actually reduce crime (<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/09/light_and_crime.html">via Bruce Schneier</a>): 


<blockquote>Much so-called security lighting is designed with little thought for how eyes -- or criminals -- operate. Marcus Felson, a professor at the School of Criminal Justice at Rutgers University, has concluded that lighting is effective in preventing crime mainly if it enables people to notice criminal activity as it's taking place, and if it doesn't help criminals to see what they're doing. Bright, unshielded floodlights -- one of the most common types of outdoor security lighting in the country -- often fail on both counts, as do all-night lights installed on isolated structures or on parts of buildings that can't be observed by passersby (such as back doors). A burglar who is forced to use a flashlight, or whose movement triggers a security light controlled by an infrared motion sensor, is much more likely to be spotted than one whose presence is masked by the blinding glare of a poorly placed metal halide "wall pack." In the early seventies, the public-school system in San Antonio, Texas, began leaving many of its school buildings, parking lots, and other property dark at night and found that the no-lights policy not only reduced energy costs but also dramatically cut vandalism.
</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/dark-skies-reduce-crime.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/dark-skies-reduce-crime.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">advocacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">development</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:25:34 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Sunrise over SW Travis County</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Kaila captured this last week (<a href="http://atthecabin.blogspot.com/2007/09/tuesday-morning-of-busy-week.html">see her original post</a>):

<img border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5108320306316373298" alt="sunrise" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_913ZGOxfvyE/RuRmQOjm7TI/AAAAAAAAA5U/aDxmxBzUr5w/s400/DSC_3741.JPG" style="cursor: pointer;"/>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/sunrise-over-sw-travis-county.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hproad.net/2007/09/sunrise-over-sw-travis-county.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:32:02 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
