We don't want your stinking bridge!

| | Comments (6)

Now and then the Power makes a show of "listening to the people". Tonight, the people of Hamilton Pool Road spoke overwhelmingly against any new bridge! It was exhilarating. But from personal experience: Temper that exhilaration with the recognition that (near) unanimity and solidarity alone is not enough; we have to keep fighting because the Power is inexorable and will have its way if we let our guard down. 100_1321-1-1.jpg.

Mighty few people from the west side of the Pedernales River seemed to be in favor of a new bridge. Sure, guardrails if you must. But nobody wanted anything that would increase traffic or decrease peacefulness.

There was a palpable turning point when the Travis County roads guy impressed on everyone that Hamilton Pool Road west of RR12 is scheduled to be a four lane highway by 2030. You could hear little gasps. Nobody out here wants that.Nobody.

So here's the deal: there's federal money TxDot can spend to improve bridge safety. They have $1.3M budgeted for this project. They are surveying the area so they can assess the needs of this old crossing. The crossing is currently "safe" and rates 64 out of 100 on some scale they have. It's not about to slide away, and the county guy (Steve Manilla, Director of Engineering) even mentioned that it can take a full 36 ton load. Still, it's an old bridge, and the guardrails are low, and it's narrow, so it's on the list for possible improvements.

That's TxDot's perspective. The county has a different agenda: Precinct 3 Commissioner Gerald Daugherty's plan to put a dense subdivision on every square inch of western Travis County. That's why the real estate development corporations put him there. County staff now has a mandate from the Commissioner's Court, CAMPO, and The Gerald, to plan for a four lane arterial where Hamilton Pool Road used to be. So the bridge they want is going to be substantially bigger than the one TxDot can build with its $1.3M and the federal limitation that the funds be spent to improve safety.

So TxDot and the county will collaborate to plan a bridge that satisfies the mandate to improve safety, and will also satisfy the CAMPO four lane mandate. The county, though, will have to come up with the extra money for the non-safety, CAMPO-compliant "improvements". That means a bond election.

The TxDot engineers at the meeting didn't say this, but it's obvious. A bridge that meets the requirements of an eventual four lane highway has to stretch high over the canyon. No more cute little winding switchbacks down to the river. That's for pedestrians, cyclists and other non-productive communities . That's not for the gravel trucks and schoolbuses full of cul-de-sac kids. They'll fly over the river and never know it's there. Same as zooming west on 71, you never see the river. It's just a little green road sign.

A guy named Bob Ashcroft chaired the meeting. He was facilitator, or moderator, and did a great job. He lives "three counties and ninety miles away" so he's disinterested in the outcome.

The meeting was very orderly with one brief outburst by a troublemaker. Me. The Gerald was the first speaker, and he began in the manner of a loquacious politician, broadly embracing his audience, gathering us into his fold: Western Travis County residents are a diverse bunch, ha ha. But you know, there are some things that unite us all, out here. Just to show you how crazy some people are, let me tell you a little story. The other day I met with some people from the Texas Bicycle Coalition. I asked them for just some simple common sense cooperation Can you just, please, explain to your people that cycling on Hamilton Pool Road is dangerous? But practically before I could finish, these fellows were leaning over the desk, pointing out specific lines in the Texas Transportation Code that said they have as much right as any vehicle to ride on this road! [Shrug] What can you do?

Loud voice from the back: Make the road safe, and let's talk about the bridge! (That's me)

Gerald: Huh?

Me: Talk about the bridge!

A lot of people don't know this about me, but I am all about safe cycling on Hamilton Pool Road. To come out here and trump up a common enemy Gerald thinks we can all unite around -- cyclists -- is pathetic. He imagined there would not be one cyclist in the audience? There were several.

And then: He never says one word about the bridge. He wraps it up in a hurry, stays through some of the engineers' discussion, and leaves before the citizen comments.

Our Commish.

Let me say one word for Gerald, in all sincerity. Despite my profound differences with him, I respect that he showed up tonight at all. Being County Commissioner is hard thankless work, and I wish someone else were doing it for us; but I think you're probably not all bad if you will do it, and participate at some level in all kinds of events at all hours with a bunch of pissed off citizens. It wasn't fun for him.


We can put him out of his misery real soon now
, you know.

Video: We are all expecting Ric Sternberg to post the video any minute now at Neighbors in Paradise. He taped the whole meeting. Not to mention: he sort of energized this whole thing by noticing the survey crew and asking all the right questions. Thanks Ric.100_1334-1.jpg

Public Comments: The organizers captured all citizen comments on paper tablets. Click "read more" to see photos of all the comments.

Here are photos of the citizen comments:

100_1324-1.jpg 100_1325-1.jpg 100_1327-1.jpg 100_1328-1.jpg 100_1329-1.jpg 100_1330-1.jpg 100_1331-1.jpg 100_1332-1.jpg 100_1333-1.jpg

6 Comments

Thanks, Hugh. Great report. Further credit due: After my wife Annie (Borden)and I (also John Worrall and Hillary Hart) ran into the TxDOT guy and surveyor down at the bridge and sounded the alarm, Christy Muse of Hill Country Alliancs (http://www.hillcountryalliance.org) started making a few calls. Then Molly Stevens, of Westcave Preserve, and Nell Pennridge picked up the ball and found out more info. The meeting was instigated and called by Pam Reese and hosted at Westcave. Neighbor Jerry Reed suggested that we do our own survey of what local folks wanted and lots of good people spoke out eloquently at the meeting. Thanks to all. Now let's keep up the pressure in any way we can.

Mara Eurich said:

I want to keep our sweet ol' bridge. Don't get me wrong. They kept saying that the federal replace the ol' bridge program was going to cram A bridge down our throat, no matter what. If we were to think tactically, Maybe the barely improved , widened and at the same level is what we should make them spend there money on. so there is something there that is not "SUBSTANDARD" at the time they want to build the big 4 lane-never slow down below 70 mpr bridge they have in their minds. I am not sure if tactical thinking is even a good thing to voice because they will twist that into a wish for a new 4 laner. Oh, and another thing. why is it that things that were safe enough for a 1930's world is not safe enough now. Has ModernER Man forgotten how to do curves, and inclines in our so much safer and easier cars and have they forgotten the courtesy to stop and let the other guy cross? If that is the case I am all for this bridge to remain to cull out those who can't so our gene pool has people who can do these simple tasks.

Jueri said:

This reminds me so much of the waterline events.

All it will take is one serious accident, real or manufactured, to take the developer bridge live.

Demanding better signage, a flood gauge linked to the signs and perhaps designated turn arounds will help negate that rationale.

RR crossings are dangerous, do they build a bridge over every one of them?

Anonymous said:

HPR won't necessarily be a 4 lane in 2030.... The 2030 plan is just the long range plan for CAMPO. Once a road is in the 2030, it is on the map so to speak. The next step will be to secure funding which can come from a County bond election or by moving into CAMPO TIP which is more like a short term plan or roads that get Federal Funds. There currently aren't any SW Travis roads in the TIP other than the "Y" which was just recently added.

FYI...prior to 2005, Reimer's Peacock Road wasn't in the CAMPO plan at all and HPR was designated appropriately as a MAD 2. In the summer of 2005, the CAMPO plan for SW Travis County changed significantly. The following roads are among the many that were bumped up from 2 lane roads to 4 lanes roads: Bee Creek, Paleface, Fitzhugh and HPR as well as the addition of RP Road. Who asked for this? What is the rationale?

Remember, Travis County like all Texas Counties has ZERO land use control. These 4 lane roads can and will likely be targets for commercial development and there is NOTHING anyone can do about this unless the legislature grants Counties more land use authority. In almost every other State in the Country, Counties have zoning tools.

There was a bill filed in the last session that would have given Hill Country Counties the ability to set density limits, collect impact fees from developers and enforce buffers between incompatible land uses. The only member of the Travis County Commissioner's Court that didn't support this bill was Gerald Daugherty.

Also during the 2005 bond election, Daugherty insisted on funding for the design for RP Road against the recommendation of the bond advisory committee that he appointed. HPR residents suggested improved shoulders for safety and bikes along HPR between 12 and 71 instead but Daugherty insisted pushing ahead on RP Road, a road we don't need, a road that serves only a handful of landowners who plan to develop their property such as the Peacock Ranch that recently got a water contract from the LCRA for 1900 homes.

hughw said:

Anon --

"HPR won't necessarily be a 4 lane in 2030" -- true. But HPR is *planned* to be a 4 lane road in 2030. Right? That's bad enough for me.

"The 2030 plan is just the long range plan for CAMPO". Agreed... take the word "just" out of that sentence and the meaning is the same. The plan is to make it a 4 lane road. Plans don't always work out. But I'd rather it not be in the plan!

Our counties definitely need the land use authority. What states have strong county authority? We need to build up this argument for the next lege.

June Baumoel said:

I would like to know when there are any meetings regarding HPR and Hammett's Crossing Bridge so I can help you fight the changes to our precious hill country. Thank you.......feel free to call as well.
June Baumoel

We live up the river, one mile from "the bridge."

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by hugh published on October 23, 2007 9:51 PM.

Canyon Lake Gorge was the previous entry in this blog.

This has been bugging me since Tuesday is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Latest from Planet HPR